ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Appellate Law and Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Appellate Law

: Appellate Law and Practice

CA1: who determines whether a termination is for cause (and defamation)

By S. COTUS

ADVERTISEMENTS

Noonan v. Staples, Inc., No. 07-2159 (8/21/08) affirms a grant of summary judgment to Staples.  Noonan was fired.  Staples says he was fired ?for cause? and therefore it doesn?t have to treat him like a man: he can?t exercise his stock options, and he doesn?t get severance benefits.  It also told 1,500 via email people that he was fired for padding his expense reports.  It normally didn?t humiliate people like this.  Strangely, the amount he ?stole? was only about $1,500, which is less than most firms spend on a summer associate outing.  So, I don?t see what Staples is so upset about.

On the stock option agreement breach issue, the First sides with Staples.  This is particularly disgusting. The First say that the question of ?cause? is for Staples alone to determine, and that courts must determine whether such a determination was ? arbitrary, capricious, or made in bad faith.?  The First doesn?t really go into why a Massachusetts court would rule this way but seems to just count noses of other jurisdictions. 

On the libel claim, Staples claims that its email was true. Noonan says it isn?t really true, but he admits that he disregarded the letter, not the spirit, of the policy.  The First rejects Noonan?s argument that the whole email painted a very nasty portrait of him, as arrogantly disregarding Staples policy based on a whim.  You have to be an equity partner to do that.  But, for this reason it also rejects the breach of the severance agreement claims: because he didn?t comply with the letter of the contract, Staples gets to not honor its part.

The actual malice theory fails as well.  But, you get a good discussion of the law of libel in Massachusetts, so, if this floats your boat, you can read it.

Full post as published by Appellate Law and Practice on August 22, 2008 at 11:00:28 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.9232 secs (new cache)