ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Construction Law Blogs -> Home Contractor vs. Homeowner

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Construction Law

: Home Contractor vs. Homeowner

The Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting Law Goes Went Into Effect on April 22, 2010

By Andrea Goldman, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
Homeowners who are considering doing a renovation must know that if their homes were built prior to 1978, their contractors are required to follow certain procedures if they are going to disturb more than 6 interior square feet of paint or 20 exterior square feet of paint.  This law requires that the general contractor must become certified with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and that the contractor himself take an eight-hour class in order to become a certified renovator and learn lead-safe practices that contain lead dust.

Although the EPA claims that it will be doing a publicity campaign to inform homeowners about the Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP Rule), I have heard very little about it outside of construction circles.  So, I feel that it is important for me as a construction lawyer to educate the public about this rule.

First of all, the preparation and education needed to comply with the law are going to cost the contractors more money.  This will be reflected in an increase in the cost of jobs.  The contractors must pay at least $300.00 to certify with the EPA, $200-$300 on average for the certified renovator training, the costs of training their workers and/or subcontractors, and additional costs for materials (plastic, protective suiting, masks, duct tape) and very expensive HEPA vacuums.  

Homeowners who ask contractors to circumvent these practices and operate in violation of the law are doing these contractors an extreme disservice.  This law is in place to protect homeowners and their families (and more particularly, pregnant women and children under six) and the contractors from potentially toxic lead dust.  Lead poisoning is a real problem with potentially tragic results, and following the lead-safe practices has been shown to significantly reduce the exposure to lead for all involved.

Please understand that your contractor is doing the right thing by giving you a lead-paint brochure and following the rules.  He could also face significant fines ($37,500.00 per infraction, per day) for failing to comply with this law.  So, please do not blame the messenger.  Respect your contractor and do not ask him to break the law.  

Full post as published by Home Contractor vs. Homeowner on July 21, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.4189 secs (from cache 09/01/14 07:52:28)