
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
Meltzer Law Offices 

Discussion of real estate and land use law and legal issues, with focus on Massachusetts.
Post Frequency: 0/day Last Entry: June 05, 2008 at 06:09:53 Recent Entries: 11
By Steve Meltzer, Esq.
Go to Meltzer Law Offices, find other Real Estate & Property Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Search
Posts
I've got a new Blog - Please come visit.
Posted on June 05, 2008I've expanded my corporate regulation and compliance practice and I'm blogging about it. Please visit that Blog. I am devoting the new blog to the education of those on the front lines of privacy issues in corporate life. This is...
Stuborn is Alive and Well - New England Fund is a Subsidy for 40B
Posted on July 20, 2007In a significant decision today, the Supreme Judicial Court, in upholding a Superior Court decision, parted with the Appeals Court analysis and expanded the understanding of a "Subsidy" for purposes of Chapter 40B affordable housing projects. The SJC has wholly...
Bellingham Bylaw giving Veto Power to Town Meeting for ?Major Developments? is Illegal.
Posted on July 09, 2007The Land Court has struck down and invalidated a Bellingham Bylaw provision requiring approval of a Concept Plan by Town Meeting for large development proposals. According to the Court, the provision provided that ?an applicant seeking the grant of a...
Appraiser's Oversight Does Not Negate Standing.
Posted on June 29, 2007The Appeals Court has reversed a Superior Court judge and found that plaintiffs have standing to appeal a grant of a variance despite an real estate appraiser's oversight regarding the current use of property. In Central Street, LLC v. Zoning...
Standing in Zoning Appeal Conferred by Local Bylaw
Posted on June 29, 2007The Appeals Court has determined that standing to appeal a special permit determination is conferred on an abutter by virtue of a local bylaw. In Sweenie v. Planning Board of Groton, the Appeals Court found that although the abutters failed...
Home is where the trailer is: Trailer on lot sufficient to destroy grandfathered lot status
Posted on June 27, 2007The Appeals Court, in an unpublished decision, has determined that a trailer on a lot, even though not being used at the time of the enactment of zoning, was enough to disqualify the lot for treatment as a grandfathered lot...
Change in use is a change in use is a change in use
Posted on June 27, 2007The Land Court has determined that, even though a use has not changed its classification under the town's bylaw, any change triggers the necessity for review. The property changed from potato chip factory to a vacant building to a plumbing...
Town must reach merits of 40B application before determining local need
Posted on June 27, 2007The Appeals Court has determined that the Town of Wrentham inappropriately denied a 40B (Comprehensive Permit) Application without even assessing the merits of the application. The town denied the permit summarily based upon the fact that it had met the...
Regulating Understanding: Can new loan disclosures solve the subprime woes?
Posted on June 22, 2007As anyone who recently borrowed money to buy a house or refinanced their mortgage can tell you, the stack of paperwork required by the banks is staggering. The ?closing package? is so complete (and I use that term loosely), even...
Hopkinton?s decision not to buy Weston Nurseries 708 acres could lead to . . . well . . . anything.
Posted on June 22, 2007After much debate, the townspeople of Hopkinton recently voted down the opportunity to purchase 708 acres from the bankrupt owners of Weston Nurseries. The land was protected under Massachusetts state law, Chapter 61A, as agricultural land and was paying lower...
No litmus test for local need; Even if a municipality reaches its 10% minimum affordable housing under Chapter 40B, a housing project may still be consistent with a local need and avoid local zoning.
Posted on June 19, 2007The Supreme Judicial Court found that the Town of Amherst appropriately granted a comprehensive permit under chapter 40B because the town had an ?overwhelming need for affordable housing? outweighing ??constraints imposed by the zoning bylaw,?? despite the fact that it...
is===1
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









