March 11th, 2008
Allstate Insurance was hit late last week with a 78 page racketeering complaint, charging the good hands people with conducting sham medical exams. The rigged exams were done to deny payments for future treatment, according to a civil complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. McGee-v-Allstate.pdfThis racketeering […]
from Publisher @
Posted in Consumer Law | No Comments »
March 10th, 2008
There is currently an investigation against Washington Mutual (WaMu) and First American Corporation in connection with home mortgages made by WaMu. The investigation concerns allegations that First American allowed WaMu to control appraisal values and apply pressure to appraisers to get housing value estimates raised in order to help close loans. Certain reports also allege […]
from Publisher @
Posted in Consumer Law | No Comments »
March 10th, 2008
Gentamycin or Gentamicin (Garamycin ophthalmic) and other members of the aminoglycoside family of antibiotics (Amikacin, Kanamycin, Neomycin, Netilmicin, Paromomycin, Streptomycin, and Tobramycin) are well known for severe side effects and irreversible injuries.
Gentamycin is prescribed as an ointment, a cream or as a solution to treat ear infections and eye infections, such as pinkeye, conjunctivitis. Garamycin […]
from Publisher @
Posted in Consumer Law | No Comments »
March 10th, 2008
Washington, DC: Since Edward Jenner’s Cowpox in the 1800’s that was used as protection against smallpox, we have all been given vaccines to prevent some kind of disease. Whether it was the Polio vaccines given to some of our parents and grandparents or Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccines given in the past three decades, we have been vaccinated for one reason or another. Nowadays, a child cannot attend public school without a complete vaccination record.
from Lawyers and Settlements :: Emerging Legal News
Posted in Consumer Law | Comments Off
March 10th, 2008
Marion, OH: Daniel Arndt, a 44-year old father of twin boys, locked himself inside a room of the family home while everyone was away with a 12-pack of beer and two bottles of blood pressure pills. Arndt had been three weeks on Chantix, the smoking cessation drug from Pfizer that blocks nicotine from reaching key receptors in the brain.
from Lawyers and Settlements :: Emerging Legal News
Posted in Consumer Law | Comments Off
March 10th, 2008
Fort Meyers, FL: It was revealed this week that as many as 10,000 Floridians have either lost their lives, or whose health have been seriously compromised at the hands of Trasylol, the vilified anti-bleeding drug pulled from the market in November of last year.
from Lawyers and Settlements :: Emerging Legal News
Posted in Consumer Law | Comments Off
March 10th, 2008
Great Falls, MT: On February 6, 2007, the father of a flight nurse killed in a crash filed suit against the company that runs the flight service operating the plane. Benefis’ Mercy Flight service is being blame for the plane crash that killed the man’s daughter, Darcy Dengel, and two other crew members near Belgrade.
from Lawyers and Settlements :: Emerging Legal News
Posted in Consumer Law | Comments Off
March 9th, 2008
Toronto, ON: As if the Zetia and Vytorinissue wasn’t enough of a frustration on its own, north of the border in Canada the Canadian equivalent of ZetiaEzetrolis proving just as mystifying. At issue: does the cholesterol drug work? Is it harmful? And did the manufacturer, as it was accused of doing in the US, withhold important safety and efficacy information in an effort to protect sales?
from Lawyers and Settlements :: Emerging Legal News
Posted in Consumer Law | Comments Off
March 9th, 2008
A Philadelphia jury unanimously found in favor of a woman who alleged that 2 doctors at 2 hospitals failed to timely diagnose breast cancer and awarded her $12 Million as compensation. Sutherlin v. Magilner. At trial, the jury heard testimony that 2 doctors at 2 different hospitals - Fox Chase Cancer Center and Albert Einstein Medical Center - missed suspicious findings on mammograms that required follow-up evaluation and would have diagnosed Stage 1 breast cancer that could have been cured with a mastectomy. The jury heard that because of the errors, the woman was not diagnosed until she had Stage 4 cancer that had spread to her bones and organs.
The woman received a screening mamogram in June 2003 from a Fox Chase mobile mammography unit that was read as showing a dilated duct unchanged from a 2001 mammogram. The jury heard testimony that the woman’s 2001 mammogram did not show a dilated duct, which meant that the 2003 mammogram should have been reported as showing a suspicious change that required further evaluation. The woman then had a 2004 mammogram at the Albert Einstein Medical Center and the physician who read that report noted several small nodular densities that were stable when compared to prior mammograms. Again, the jury heard evidence that the doctor mis-read the mammogram because the woman’s prior mammograms had not reported nodular densities. The woman’s lawyers argued that doctors again missed a chance to instruct the woman to obtain follow-up medical care that would have diagnosed the cancer. Ultimately, the woman was found to have Stage 4 metastatic breast cancer in the location where the 2003 mammogram showed a dilated duct.
Prior to trial, the Albert Einstein Medical Center and the doctor who read the 2004 mammogram settled with the woman for a confidential amount of money. Fox Chase and its physician had refused offers to settle along with Albert Einstein for a total of $2 Million (which was the maximum amount available under the doctors’ insurance coverage), offering only $125,000. The woman’s lawyer had warned Fox Chase that if a jury ultimately awarded more than $2 Million, the woman would be eligible to pursue bad faith claims for failing to settle.
This case demonstrates that any woman diagnosed with breast cancer even though she has been receiving regular screening mammograms should have the films and reports reviewed by a competent medical malpractice attorney who can have medical experts determine if suspicious findings were actually present on the studies, but not identified.
from Philadelphia Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog
Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off
March 9th, 2008
Anchorage, AK: Spectators in a courtroom in Anchorage are getting an earful about how Zyprexa maker Eli Lilly waited, according to a witness, almost nine years to add warnings to Zyprexa with regard to a risk for diabetes, elevated blood sugar levels and weight gain.
from Lawyers and Settlements :: Emerging Legal News
Posted in Consumer Law | Comments Off